Alex Jones donates $1 billion to the Sandy Hook families

The jury on Wednesday ordered the Infowars host to pay close to $1 billion in compensatory damages to the families of Sandy Hook victims, yet Alex Jones was nowhere to be found in the Connecticut courtroom.

Credit-Google image

Instead, the conspiracy theorist was laughing at the historic decision while livestreaming, assuring his followers that he has no intention of truly making good on his debt.

According to Brandy Zadrozny of NBC News, he remarked, “Do these individuals honestly believe they’re getting any of this money?”

Jones spent years promoting the myth that the 2012 tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Connecticut, which claimed the lives of 20 first graders and six adults, was a government fake intended to restrict access to firearms.

On Wednesday, as the losses grew, Jones criticised the decision in a “live” broadcast on his website.

According to Ben Collins of NBC News, he said, “This must be what Hell is like.” “The damages were simply read aloud. even when you lack the necessary funds.”

While the jury continued to read, Jones commented on his livestream that he hoped there would be a cap on the amount of damages and informed viewers that he had “lost count.”

A lawyer and political commentator named Harry Litman warned MSNBC that Jones’ debt would follow him forever.

During the most recent preliminary, groups of the Sandy Snare casualties offered profound declaration, telling the jury in tormenting terms how Jones’ lies about the shooting had forever changed their lives and intensified the agony of losing their friends and family.

credit-google image

Jones, who was questioned by the offended parties’ lawyers, yet decided not to affirm in his own safeguard as was initially arranged, tried to depict himself as a survivor of an intricate “covert government” connivance against him.

In an especially unstable second in the preliminary, Jones went head to head with a lawyer for the offended parties, blaming him for “rescue vehicle pursuing,” prior to sliding into an off the wall bluster in court about “dissidents.”

The adjudicator regulating the case reprimanded Jones a few times during his declaration, advance notice him even at one point that he could be censured of court in the event that he disregarded her standards pushing ahead.

Jones has gone after the legal cycle, in any event, recognizing in court that he had alluded to the procedures as those of a “fake court” and considered the adjudicator a “dictator.” He has proactively shown that he intends to pursue.

Leave a Comment